[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by LadyShea

How do they do that?

I don't want to get into explaining the exact model at this point. I want to establish the validity of efferent vision before trying to figure out the exact mechanism. I could explain what I believe to be the mechanism and be completely wrong. Sound familiar?

Originally Posted by LadyShea

What does the visual cortex do?

Originally Posted by peacegirl

The visual cortex has many functions so you can't expect me to answer you in an intelligent way unless your question is more directed.

Originally Posted by LadyShea

Pick 3 major functions and explain how they work within the efferent vision model

All the major functions that work with afferent vision work with efferent vision. The major functions are the retina, optic nerve, and visual cortex.

Originally Posted by LadyShea

Since you agree that light travels and can be reflected or absorbed, what happens to the photons that hit or eyes or our cameras?
Why do the moons of Jupiter appear to be one place when we observe them, though that is not their known, actual location?

You are mushing this altogether. I stated that light travels but it does not reflect the image. Do you not get this? What's the problem?

Originally Posted by LadyShea

We never said "light reflects the image" either, that phrase has no meaning, and we've never used it, so that's either you misrepresenting our view or not understanding our view.

I meant to say the object does not reflect an image. Light bounces off of the object but does not [carry] the image with it. Blue is seen by the eye, but blue (the blue wavelength) is not in the light itself.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Stop using the moons of Jupiter until further evidence comes in, or you are protecting your worldview based on a [possible] mistake more than wanting to know the truth.

Originally Posted by LadyShea

I'm asking you to explain the Moons of Jupiter observation under efferent vision.

There is no mistake in the observations, you can observe it for yourself!!!

I didn't say there's a mistake. I said that there could be some other explanation for this phenomenon. It is not my responsibility to disprove the moons of Jupiter experiment. It's my responsibility to explain efferent vision, and why I believe Lessans was spot on. The rest is up to scientists to figure out.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

This constant attack on me is getting very old. If you don't want to work with me to see if Lessans could have been right, then let's give it up. I'm not here to beg for your approval.

Originally Posted by LadyShea

I am trying to work with you. You haven't presented a working model even!

I have explained enough about light and sight to show that efferent vision is not out of the question like so many in here believe.