View Single Post
  #13587  
Old 10-29-2011, 12:23 AM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDLXXX
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
I don't think the inverse square law relates to my experiment because they are talking about the point source of light. My point source of light would be the Sun because I would be using natural daylight. Therefore, the object would continue to be illuminated regardless of how far away the object was from the camera.
In order to get an image, the camera must gather the reflected light of the object, so the object becomes the source for photographic purposes.
The camera does not gather reflected light because the light is not being reflected toward the camera. Yes, the object is the source of the photograph but I don't understand what you mean by "the object becomes the source for photographic purposes." Obviously, without the object there would be no corresponding light on the film.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13682 seconds with 10 queries