Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2005, 02:36 AM
Sauron's Avatar
Sauron Sauron is offline
Dark Lord, on the Dark Throne
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: VDCCLXXXVIII
Images: 157
Default In a libertarian world, this would be OK

:glare:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/...in690088.shtml

Quote:
'Whites Only' Deed Sparks Lawsuit

AP) The modest brick house, with its yard full of wilting tulips and rusted old cars, isn't a candidate for the pages of Better Homes and Gardens.

But on a spring day in 2002, it was just what Nealie Pitts had in mind. She approached the owner, Rufus T. Matthews, and asked the price.

According to court documents, Matthews said the house was selling for $83,000 - but that a deed restriction meant only whites were eligible to buy it.

"I was hurt and angry, like he had slapped me in the face," Pitts, who is black, said in an e-mail.
[...]
In milder forms, covenants can be used to control things like the color homeowners can paint their houses.

But in the Jim Crow South, they were often used to keep neighborhoods white. Racially restrictive covenants were ruled illegal by the Supreme Court in 1948.

"Many people don't even know they're in their deeds," Chamberlin said, adding would-be homebuyers can ask to have the racist language removed. "That can't be used as a reason to stop a sale."

According to court documents, Matthews told Pitts his house in suburban Richmond was "not for colored. We decided we are going to keep this area right here all white."

The next day she contacted HOME, which sent out a black test buyer.

"Precisely the same thing happened," Chamberlin said. "We have it on tape."

On Thursday, Matthews told The Associated Press that he would sell his home only to a white buyer. But he denied the house was for sale, saying a sale sign he had was for items in his yard. "The house has never been for sale," he said.
__________________
In the land of Mordor, where the shadows lie...:sauron:
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2005, 03:40 AM
Gurdur Gurdur is offline
Person
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: MLXIX
Default Re: In a libertarian world, this would be OK

The big danger with libertarianism is not in itself as a coherent ideology (such as it is) being implemented; the big danger is that some will adopt slogans and half-principles from it to justify not a libertarian society in the end, but instead a corporatist one.

Oh well, I should care. I'ma livin it upina social democratic Dolce Vita.
:popcorn:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2005, 05:01 AM
lpetrich's Avatar
lpetrich lpetrich is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: DXXIII
Default Re: In a libertarian world, this would be OK

I think that Gurdur's right -- it seems to me that all that will result is the libertarian counterpart of "Animal Farm", where their beloved heroes will become the new government, even if under another name.

For more, see Mike Huben's Critiques of Libertarianism.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2005, 06:56 AM
xouper's Avatar
xouper xouper is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: DCCLXXXI
Images: 1
Default

(never mind)

Last edited by xouper; 04-23-2005 at 08:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.54760 seconds with 14 queries