[QUOTE=livius drusus]I'm against the death penalty, but it seems to me that this case has enough wrong with it to be an example of how not to implement capital punishment even for people who generally agree with it.
The overturned special circumstances alone make it a very shady call. Then there's the incompetence of his defense lawyer, the introduction of a prior conviction for murder in another state - a conviction tainted by illegally obtained evidence - the far lighter sentences for his co-defendants (and not because they were less involved), and his history of brain damage both from birth and from later injuries which the jury heard nothing of, among several other things.
Here's Amnesty International's take on the case which gives more background.
This sounds horrible, especially where a ruthless lawyer atrributed the flat personality, which is caused by brain damage, to having the personality of a murderer. Is what I can't believe is that we even should be put in a position to have to try and convince a governor to save his life. Is it not obvious that there could be something seriously wrong going on here, and to send someone to the guillatine, even if maybe they are a murderer. It is nuts. This brings out another arguement: should capital punishment be legal if it means that it could bring even one innocent person to death? I personally believe no.