Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2004, 08:00 PM
viscousmemories's Avatar
viscousmemories viscousmemories is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ypsilanti, Mi
Gender: Male
Posts: XXXCMLIV
Blog Entries: 1
Images: 9
Default The Free Music Revolution

The cover of this months Wired magazine says: "The Beastie Boys Fight For Your Right To Copy - The free music revolution gets real"

Inside I found a CD with music by The Beastie Boys, Chuck D., David Byrne, and a host of other artists. The fine print of the license agreement says, "Sampling Plus: Songs under this license allow noncommercial sharing and commercial sampling, but advertising uses are restricted."

Beneath that, it says: For full details, visit http://creativecommons.org/wired

This isn't the first time I've heard of the Creative Commons approach to licensing, but I'm pretty excited to see it gaining more mainstream attention.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2004, 09:45 PM
ApostateAbe ApostateAbe is offline
good old boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: DCCCLXXIV
Default Re: The Free Music Revolution

If it is OK to copy music for free, then it is also ok to copy movies, books, TV series, and software games and utilities. They are all just information. When that becomes common, it will mean that producers, directors, actors, film crews, authors, illustrators, publishers, and software programmers will not be able to make a living doing what they do. It will mean that we can get art only from people willing to do it for free. There ARE some pretty good flash cartoons and freeware, but say goodbye to anything big-budget and new.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2004, 10:19 PM
viscousmemories's Avatar
viscousmemories viscousmemories is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ypsilanti, Mi
Gender: Male
Posts: XXXCMLIV
Blog Entries: 1
Images: 9
Default Re: The Free Music Revolution

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe
If it is OK to copy music for free
The point of the licensing provided by Creative Commons isn't about doing away with copyright altogether, it's about providing alternative license options to anyone who produces and wants to distribute creative content without the restrictions or complexities of traditional copyright.

From here:

Quote:
Is Creative Commons against copyright?

Not at all. Our licenses help you retain your copyright while allowing certain exceptions to it, upon certain conditions. In fact, our licenses rely upon copyright for their enforcement -- just like the GNU General Public License. The justification for intellectual property protection (under U.S. law, at least) is the "promot[ion of] the progress of science and the useful arts." We want to promote science and the useful arts, too, and believe that helping creators fine-tune the exercise of their rights to suit their preferences helps do just that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.21920 seconds with 14 queries