Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 11-04-2005, 04:50 PM
Dingfod's Avatar
Dingfod Dingfod is offline
A fellow sophisticate
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cowtown, Kansas
Gender: Male
Blog Entries: 21
Images: 92
Default U.S. House puts kibosh on eminent domain

Somewhat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AP
Conservative defenders of private property and liberal protectors of the poor joined in an overwhelming House vote to prevent local and state governments from seizing homes and businesses for use in economic development projects.

The House legislation, passed 376-38, was in response to a widely criticized 5-4 ruling by the Supreme Court last June that allowed eminent domain authority to be used to obtain land for tax revenue-generating commercial purposes.
Emphasis mine.

I can see the need for eminent domain in the case of public thoroughfares, public utilities, and the like. But who does a shopping mall primarily benefit? If cities, counties and even states can take land and hand it to private enterprise just because more tax revenues are generated, what is to stop them from taking your house and selling the property to McDonald's or Walmart. Certainly the sales tax revenues will more than replace the property taxes they get from your little shithole. What is the objection to a law limiting government's power of eminent domain?
Reply With Quote
 

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.93288 seconds with 13 queries