Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 06-27-2006, 05:00 AM
LionsDen LionsDen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: CDII
Default President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses


Remember the Kelo case? Big government took private property for the benefit of other private citizens.


This is a vampire still in need of a permanent death. The President's order today is a good start.


Quote:

June 26, 2006

Bush Issues Executive Order on Eminent Domain





by Pete Winn, associate editor

Last Friday marked the anniversary of the Supreme Court's infamous Kelo decision.


It has been one year since the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion that shocked the country and attacked the fundamental American doctrine, "A man's home is his castle."


Now the backlash is under way.


President Bush marked the anniversary of the Kelo v. New London ( Conn.) decision by issuing an executive order barring the federal government from taking private land for someone else's private use.


Specifically, Bush's order said "it is the policy of the United States to protect the rights of Americans to their private property" by "limiting the taking of private property by the Federal Government to situations in which the taking is for public use, with just compensation, and for the purpose of benefiting the general public."



Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said Bush's order specifically requires agencies that answer to the president to make sure, when they exercise eminent domain, that people's property is taken only for a public use, such as a road or airport, rather than what Kelo allows — the taking of private property for any use, including commercial development.


"Kelo interpreted the Fifth Amendment to allow state and local governments to condemn private property for the benefit of private developers," Hausknecht said, "to build privately owned improvements on that property for the hope of a public benefit, such as a higher tax base."

The ruling, cited by family advocates as an egregious example of judicial activism, sprung from a 1997 case in which the city of New London, Conn., allowed the New London Development Corp. to seize Susette Kelo's entire neighborhood for a shopping mall. Kelo and some of her neighbors sued — and lost.


Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, applauded Bush for taking executive action.
http://www.family.org/cforum/news/a0041033.cfm



This was a brief quote from a much longer article.



Quote:
"We did a study from 1998 to 2002, which showed more than 10,000 instances of eminent domain abuse around the country," Anderson told CitizenLink. "But in the last year, since Kelo, over 5,700 properties are being threatened or condemned for private development — that's nearly triple the yearly average."


Check it out.
__________________
FREE LEGAL REPRESENTATION to victims of anti-faith bias including employees, students, teachers, churches, and cities: Alliance Defense Fund, Christian Law Association, American Center for Law and Justice, The Thomas More, The Becket Fund, The Rutherford Institute, Pacific Justice, Christian Legal Society, Liberty Counsel, Home School Legal and Defense Association.
Reply With Quote
 

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.66927 seconds with 13 queries