Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthinks
Do you think your statement "I reckon only a lack of charity allows you to see Coberst's 41 posts in a relation of irony to his failure to engage in discussion here at  . " is a statement of facts in evidence?
That's a separate issue
I'd love to hear why you think so.
* mickthinks sighs
It's not a dispute of TLR's own subjective experience and it doesn't imply that he is lying about it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthinks
Sure, let's talk about that [whether Mick has disputed LTR's reports of his purely subjective experience] [...] Do you think this discussion on whether only a lack of charity could allow someone to see cobherst's posting habits as amusing is [...] a debate about a subjective experience?
It's not a dispute of LTR's own subjective experience and it doesn't imply that he is lying about it.
|
So, to be clear, you agree that TLR found coberst's behavior ironic, that he found the irony amusing, that there was no ill will motivating his amusement, and that none of this is up for debate? |
If you have the moral courage.
Re: Pittsburgh cop shooter was a Stormfronter
Threaded Mode
