HH Rumors - Page 2

Seven of Nine · #26 06-18-2005, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gurdur

I shall make the rule clearer that in HH a requisite is that people be adults both literally and metaphorically. Thanks for the inspiration.

Wowser! There's a membership thinning policy, if I ever heard one. :wink:

Dingfod · #27 06-18-2005, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gurdur

I shall make the rule clearer that in HH a requisite is that people be adults both literally and metaphorically. Thanks for the inspiration.

Wowser! There's a membership thinning policy, if I ever heard one. :wink:

It's a wonder I'm allowed in the door.

Seven of Nine · #28 06-18-2005, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrenly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gurdur

I shall make the rule clearer that in HH a requisite is that people be adults both literally and metaphorically. Thanks for the inspiration.

Wowser! There's a membership thinning policy, if I ever heard one. :wink:

It's a wonder I'm allowed in the door.

Warrenly, are you, like, a real grown-up??????

Dingfod · #29 06-18-2005, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

Warrenly, are you, like, a real grown-up??????

Not really. I'm kind of like one, but not a real one. For that you'd have to meet my sister the doctor, she's the only grownup person in my family.

Seven of Nine · #30 06-18-2005, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrenly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

Warrenly, are you, like, a real grown-up??????

Not really. I'm kind of like one, but not a real one. For that you'd have to meet my sister the doctor, she's the only grownup person in my family.

I'm pretty impressed with "kind of like one"!

I have trouble telling adults from Pod People without a program.

Dingfod · #31 06-18-2005, 06:28 PM

Well, I mean, I'm large and hairy like an adult, but mentally, I'm about 13.

Seven of Nine · #32 06-18-2005, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrenly

Well, I mean, I'm large and hairy like an adult, but mentally, I'm about 13.

Pobably it's too late to do anything about my mental age, but if I find I'm becoming hairy, I'm going to the doctor pronto!

At least you aren't a Pod Person, warrenly.... :kickscan:

Dingfod · #33 06-18-2005, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

At least you aren't a Pod Person, warrenly.... :kickscan:

We can't know that for sure, can we?

SharonDee · #34 06-18-2005, 06:42 PM

Seven of Nine · #35 06-18-2005, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrenly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

At least you aren't a Pod Person, warrenly.... :kickscan:

We can't know that for sure, can we?

If we study the supposed adult as SharonDee has demonstrated, then, yes, we can. We mustn't fall asleep, though.

Gurdur · #36 06-18-2005, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seven of Nine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gurdur

I shall make the rule clearer that in HH a requisite is that people be adults both literally and metaphorically. Thanks for the inspiration.

....... There's a membership thinning policy, if I ever heard one. :wink:

You say that like that's a bad thing.

pescifish · #37 06-18-2005, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

I'm not interested Gurdur

Holy carp, Sweetie. Why the hell did you even bother with the first crapfest post (what is now the OP of this thread) if you aren't interested?

Just to act like a twit, or what? Insinuation, accusation followed by disinterest; what a fucking waste of time all around. Unfortunately, for the folks on this board, they probably think every practicing Catholic is as much a nitwit as you act on this board. As a representative, you do a disservice to your religion, IMO. :glare:

Sweetie · #38 06-18-2005, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pescifish

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

I'm not interested Gurdur

Holy carp, Sweetie. Why the hell did you even bother with the first crapfest post (what is now the OP of this thread) if you aren't interested?

Just to act like a twit, or what? Insinuation, accusation followed by disinterest; what a fucking waste of time all around. Unfortunately, for the folks on this board, they probably think every practicing Catholic is as much a nitwit as you act on this board. As a representative, you do a disservice to your religion, IMO. :glare:

I thought I explained. VM asked why I was getting personal with "everybody" on a thread.

I said that I was getting personal with him because he was with me, with godfry because he always makes everything personal with me, Catholics and all that, I am to blame for all Catholicism ever in the history of it's existence, with justaman for my own reasons which he can deal with and........

with D. Scarlatti in a thread in Philosophy and morality because we have a history. Just by way of explanation.

Make sense now?

Beth · #39 06-18-2005, 07:32 PM

No, it really doesn't.

Sweetie · #40 06-18-2005, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beth

No, it really doesn't.

Please, clarify what doesn't make sense so then I could help you with it.

viscousmemories · #41 06-18-2005, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

I said that I was getting personal with him because he was with me [...]

It's not a huge deal to me, but that's not how I see it. Can you link to where I got personal with you first?

Sweetie · #42 06-18-2005, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viscousmemories

It's not a huge deal to me, but that's not how I see it. Can you link to where I got personal with you first?

We wouldn't want to derail this thread too, would we? She wants to know where this came from, that's where it came from. From the Women, Equality or whatnot thread in Politics.

viscousmemories · #43 06-18-2005, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

We wouldn't want to derail this thread too, would we? She wants to know where this came from, that's where it came from. From the Women, Equality or whatnot thread in Politics.

No, I didn't think you could.

Sweetie · #44 06-18-2005, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viscousmemories

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

We wouldn't want to derail this thread too, would we? She wants to know where this came from, that's where it came from. From the Women, Equality or whatnot thread in Politics.

No, I didn't think you could.

Right, well thanks for the demonstration. Part of it was the nitpicking of me personally when you are doing the exact same thing you want to nitpick me for. I really am a target. Other people can do the same thing, but since it's personal you pick on me personally.

You may do just that vm, but you have demonstrated that you do just that.

Beth · #45 06-18-2005, 07:43 PM

First off, I did not see Tom getting personal first.

Second, what was the point mentioning Scarlatti in that thread when the only post he had made was a comment about it becoming a flamefest? It makes no sense to me and I agree with Pesci's assessment 100%.

pescifish · #46 06-18-2005, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

Quote:

Originally Posted by pescifish

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

I'm not interested Gurdur

Holy carp, Sweetie. Why the hell did you even bother with the first crapfest post (what is now the OP of this thread) if you aren't interested?

Just to act like a twit, or what? Insinuation, accusation followed by disinterest; what a fucking waste of time all around. Unfortunately, for the folks on this board, they probably think every practicing Catholic is as much a nitwit as you act on this board. As a representative, you do a disservice to your religion, IMO. :glare:

I thought I explained. VM asked why I was getting personal with "everybody" on a thread.

I said that I was getting personal with him because he was with me, with godfry because he always makes everything personal with me, Catholics and all that, I am to blame for all Catholicism ever in the history of it's existence, with justaman for my own reasons which he can deal with and........

with D. Scarlatti in a thread in Philosophy and morality because we have a history. Just by way of explanation.

Make sense now?

Fair enough on the aspect of why you got 'personal'.

However, my question came up when you posted that you are not interested in Gurdur's efforts to provide information regarding HH issues. So, while you may have a reason (explained here) why you "got personal" with D.Scarlatti, what can we infer from the results of what happened after you posted that particular "something personal"? You posted an accusation that didn't make sense in the context of the thread it was posted and an insinuation of undisclosed activities at another board and or in private communications. And that you are not interested in following up.

Stir the shit and walk away? That sucks, in my book. Your explanation does not explain why you posted publicly a personal accusation but are not interested in following up with reality. That still counts as nitwit behavior when done in a group of people on a public board.

Sweetie · #47 06-18-2005, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beth

First off, I did not see Tom getting personal first.

Second, what was the point mentioning Scarlatti in that thread when the only post he had made was a comment about it becoming a flamefest? It makes no sense to me and I agree with Pesci's assessment 100%.

He said everybody, why am I getting personal with "everybody." I didn't know what he meant by everybody. If he meant things were personal between me and jman, him, Scarlatti and godfry, then indeed, he was right.

Why did I interpret things like that? Because I wasn't getting personal with anybody else but him on that particular thread. Flames between me and Adora I clarified, don't count as personal.

Beth · #48 06-18-2005, 07:46 PM

I still have yet to understand why you continue to accuse Tom of beginning the personal nitpicking in that thread. I saw many personal slights coming from you to others. Are you simply blind to what you say?

It still does not explain why you mentioned Scarlatti.

Beth · #49 06-18-2005, 07:49 PM

No, you got personal with me as well, in that thread, I just did not bite.

viscousmemories · #50 06-18-2005, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

You may do just that vm, but you have demonstrated that you do just that.

Sweetie, right here in this thread, today, you claimed that you got personal with me in a previous thread because I had gotten personal with you. I asked you to provide some evidence that I had gotten personal with you first, and you don't have any evidence. However, you use the fact that I am defending myself against your unfounded character aspersion here as "evidence" that I am picking on you. Whatever. Keep going around making unsupported accusations that I am picking on you and I will keep defending myself.