Climategate 2.0 - Page 8

davidm · #**176** 12-23-2011, 02:37 AM

Wow, that is really impressive, Numb. :derp:

davidm · #**177** 12-23-2011, 03:22 AM

Secrets from the past point to rapid climate change in the future.

seebs · #**178** 12-24-2011, 06:14 AM

The beautiful thing is, I briefly thought he'd renamed his account.

Kael · #**179** 12-24-2011, 03:21 PM

I didn't even notice the name difference until JEROLL posted in the RONPAUL thread...

SR71 · #**180** 01-18-2012, 04:56 AM

We made the top ten list again. Awesome. Come for the weather. Stay for the skull.

Quote: 2011 has been a year of extreme weather, the WMO reported. Drought in East Africa has left tens of thousands dead; lethal floods submerged large areas of Asia; the United States suffered 14 separate weather catastrophes with damage topping $1 billion each, including severe drought in Texas and the southwest, heavy floods in the northeast and the Mississippi valley, and the most active tornado season ever known.

Global Warming: 2011 Tied For The 10th Hottest Year On Record

Watser? · #**181** 01-18-2012, 05:13 AM

When I left in mid-December the river Waal (basically the main branch of the Rhine) was at a very unseasonable low. Two weeks later I heard it was overflowing its banks, which in itself is not unusual, but it is definitely very unusual for it to rise so fast. We had a very unseasonably warm (and dry) September and October after the wettest Summer in recent history (even by Dutch standards). So yeah, pretty unusual weather all year round.

Doctor X · #**182** 01-18-2012, 10:45 AM

Which DISPROVES Global Warming since the river would have gotten SMALLER by evaporations!11!

--J.D.

Megatron · #**183** 01-18-2012, 03:47 PM

The low tonight in Albany is EIGHT DEGREES. Global warming my ass :hmph:

PopeyesPappy · #**184** 01-18-2012, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Should not the conclusions be able to be replicated?

I skimmed through this whole thread but never noticed that this particular assertion was ever addressed.

The conclusions have been replicated again and again. NASA, NOAA, Hadley, they all use different datasets and they all show the same thing. Now, as has already been pointed out, the fuckwit skeptic at Berkley has combined all the available datasets in an attempt to prove you right. But guess what. They came up with the same conclusion as everyone else.

Dataset

ThreeLawsSafe · #**185** 01-18-2012, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PopeyesPappy

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Should not the conclusions be able to be replicated?

I skimmed through this whole thread but never noticed that this particular assertion was ever addressed.

The conclusions have been replicated again and again. NASA, NOAA, Hadley, they all use different datasets and they all show the same thing. Now, as has already been pointed out, the fuckwit skeptic at Berkley has combined all the available datasets in an attempt to prove you right. But guess what. They came up with the same conclusion as everyone else.

Dataset

Geesh. How do you get more definitive results than this in climatology? Impressive.

Doctor X · #**186** 01-19-2012, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PopeyesPappy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mildred

Should not the conclusions be able to be replicated?

I skimmed through this whole thread but never noticed that this particular assertion was ever addressed.

You will get that a lot with this threads. Let me introduce you to davidm--he is the one banging head into the wall in the back.

--J.D.

P.S.

P.P.S.

Watser? · #**187** 01-23-2012, 03:27 AM

SR71 · #**188** 01-23-2012, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR71

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR71

Check out my hockey stick collection.

Wasn't that the first fraud exposed?

Hockey stick re-re-re-re-confirmed for the however manyeth time. No fraud, just facts, Jerome. Funniest part is, the Koch brothers partially funded the study. Bet they have buyer's remorse. Chortle.

Cooling the warming debate: Major new analysis confirms that global warming is real

Global warming is real, according to a major study released Oct. 20. Despite issues raised by climate change skeptics, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature study finds reliable evidence of a rise in the average world land temperature of approximately 1°C since the mid-1950s.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PopeyesPappy

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Should not the conclusions be able to be replicated?

I skimmed through this whole thread but never noticed that this particular assertion was ever addressed.

The conclusions have been replicated again and again. NASA, NOAA, Hadley, they all use different datasets and they all show the same thing. Now, as has already been pointed out, the fuckwit skeptic at Berkley has combined all the available datasets in an attempt to prove you right. But guess what. They came up with the same conclusion as everyone else.

Dataset

You had to drill down.

PopeyesPappy · #**189** 01-23-2012, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR71

You had to drill down.

What's funny is that I acknowledged this very post when I said the Berkley study had already been mentioned.

Oh well, I did say I skimmed through the thread....

SR71 · #**190** 01-23-2012, 03:49 AM

If you ever want to argue climate endlessly and fruitlessly with Libertards and Fucktards let me know. There is this place. 277 pages of :nerdrage:

PopeyesPappy · #**191** 01-23-2012, 04:04 AM

It’s all good. I have a years long ongoing dialog about climate change with my own personal fucktard libratard. Climate change is a favorite topic of mine though. The only reason that I’m going to be studying biology instead of atmospheric science when I start back to school next fall is because Christy and Spencer are both part of that department here at UAH.

Jerome · #**192** 01-23-2012, 04:13 AM

as if the world did not exist before we started recording from thermometers...

SR71 · #**193** 01-23-2012, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PopeyesPappy

It’s all good. I have a years long ongoing dialog about climate change with my own personal fucktard libratard. Climate change is a favorite topic of mine though. The only reason that I’m going to be studying biology instead of atmospheric science when I start back to school next fall is because Christy and Spencer are both part of that department here at UAH.

LOL. Roy. Want to move to Long Island?

Global Warming: Man or Myth - Global Warming Denial Machine

PopeyesPappy · #**194** 01-23-2012, 04:15 AM

What's your point Jerome?

Jerome · #**195** 01-23-2012, 04:18 AM

That you are determining the winner of a marathon by taking a single pic after the first 10 yards.

PopeyesPappy · #**196** 01-23-2012, 04:19 AM

and how many times are you going to change that chart?

SR71 · #**197** 01-23-2012, 04:19 AM

Playing with Jerome is like bayoneting a tire on a pole.

Jerome · #**198** 01-23-2012, 04:20 AM

I gave you a more apparent chart.

SR71 · #**199** 01-23-2012, 04:30 AM

What era are we in, Jerome? How long have we been in it? Why is that important?

Hints: Holocene. Rougly 12K years. That is when man flourished by domesticating food crops and livestock.

PopeyesPappy · #**200** 01-23-2012, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME

I gave you a more apparent chart.

The thing you’re apparently having a hard time grasping is that we have a pretty good understanding of the different forcings that drive the oscillations on your chart. Right now the only one of those forcings that is really coming into play is increased green house gasses. Human activity is the primary cause of the current increase in those green house gasses.