I wrote about a bitcoin mining trend that isn't getting nearly enough attention.
Bitcoin miners/fossil fuel companies—they are increasingly one & the same—are buying portable generators, hauling in server farms in shipping containers & mining bitcoin right at the wellheads
I wrote about a bitcoin mining trend that isn't getting nearly enough attention.
Bitcoin miners/fossil fuel companies—they are increasingly one & the same—are buying portable generators, hauling in server farms in shipping containers & mining bitcoin right at the wellheads
Oh yes what a wonderful replacement to broken IP law where the current holder of a token is the no questions asked owner of its IP (part of the Bored Ape contract). I can’t wait for this bright future where the next Marvel movie is put on hold as Disney negotiates with HulkBusterNut69 for use of the IronMan IP.
Well, now that you’ve named him, that’s different! The FBI needs to get involved before Green starts receiving ripped up pixels in the mail!
Oh yes what a wonderful replacement to broken IP law where the current holder of a token is the no questions asked owner of its IP (part of the Bored Ape contract).
So on one hand Ugly Apes are said to be programmatically generated with a type of rarity mix and match system and one youtube lawyer I’ve watched has said programmatically generated art can’t be copyrighted.
On the other, the Bored Ape contract goes into specific details that all IP rights belong only to the cryptographically verifiable owner of each Ape and they will not make any changes to ownership themselves.
from the account that brought you hits like "destroying a physical object makes the NFT I made to represent it absorb its value-essence" pic.twitter.com/3FUeEA8uFo
from the account that brought you hits like "destroying a physical object makes the NFT I made to represent it absorb its value-essence" pic.twitter.com/3FUeEA8uFo
Why Ape IP rights are meaningless, demonstrated by Dan Olson, as expected.
As far as APE NFT’s are concerned each one of these Ape’s is a unique item and different people may own the token to each individual Ape image. The background is also part of the individual NFT, making grey background ape a unique item from green background ape.
*If* it was possible for someone to own the IP rights to what is essentially the visualization of a bunch of dice rolls, they would be the IP rights to only the full still image, with that specific background, clothes and expression.
Having just escaped from a project that was due to go live on 18 April, but was bumped by one or two weeks many many times, and whose latest go-live date of next week 13 June is now definitely not happening ... that comic could fit into a great many thrads here.