Wow! Just straight up, get an adult to verify that your teenage daughter appears fuckable, but not slutty. That they had to include and bold staying within the dress code, means they know exactly what they are asking.
Chances MRA reddit wrote this assignment, increasing.
Is it? Have I lost my sense of humor, or perhaps I’ve just been watching more creative people, but that’s not funny, or offensive, it’s just… lame, and American audiences seem to lap it up. Oh look, he pointed out that ‘they’ can be singular or plural, isn’t that funny!
I haven’t watched this or any other of Chapelle’s specials so I could easily not know what I’m talking about, maybe he delivers it really well? Because in writing it sounds like something I would see an awkward teen say on reddit.
He says he’s really just angry at white people, but then goes on to defend angry white lady JK Rowling like he’s on the white lady’s side who wrote a book that included no main black character and legal slavery. Does he know that it’s heavily right wing people that are lapping up his gendered hate? Is the point that it’s funny he’s taking their money while bitching about them? It seems like he’s promoting a decent amount of right wing propaganda in his anger towards white people.
I have a theory based on his overall history, that he’s a bit of a narcissist that’s also angry at himself for being a narcissist and feels uncomfortable for seeking the thrill, because he seems to see-saw between basking in addictive cheers and running and hiding from the world, always with a general air of anger and melancholy to his words.
[Insert Dave Chappelle crack meme here with “Hey does anyone have any more of that applause?”]
To continue from the last post, it would appear Netflix is using Dave Chapelle to push an agenda of gendered anti-trans views, while using Chapelle as the whipping boy (yes I know what I said) to hide behind.
According to leaked reports they paid $23m for Chapelle’s 2019 special, which they rated as only bringing in $19m in revenue. Despite that, they paid $24m for the latest special which is also not expected to break even. The co-CEO of Netflix has defended the decision to air what appears now to be unprofitable works. Which makes me really wonder what a white heterosexual older man would get out of… wait no, nevermind I get it now.
Motherfuckers, non gendered LEGO is how it was in the first place:
With new research that reveals gendering toys reduces kids’ creative potential, @LEGO_Group will no longer sell their toys by gender. https://t.co/ht9v1t4zyc
Motherfuckers, non gendered LEGO is how it was in the first place:
With new research that reveals gendering toys reduces kids’ creative potential, @LEGO_Group will no longer sell their toys by gender. https://t.co/ht9v1t4zyc
I grant that this is a LEGO marketting announcement masquerading as a news story about social progress, but ...
It isn't really true that LEGO's origins were not in gendered play. What is true is that LEGO used not to be targetted towards girls. Almost but not quite the same thing, and a difference which I think is important.
__________________
... it's just an idea
Last edited by mickthinks; 10-25-2021 at 10:56 AM.
Thanks, from:
Ari (10-25-2021), beyelzu (10-25-2021), JoeP (10-25-2021)
Indeed, Lego has been gendered in the past, but no one really remembers because the pieces were interchangeable. In the 70s lego had a homemaker set targeted at girls, but once they got dumped into the big lego box, you couldn’t tell which were pieces meant for girls.
They’re still gendered today, it just seems like they’ve removed specific “boy” and “girl” sections, the lego playsets targeted towards girls are the Lego-Friends sets, but there is some progress as the friends sets include a larger variety than just Sally Homemaker.
Dave Chapelle’s deterioration into a right wing troll is almost complete.
He’s now being defended by Fox & Friends. Has said he’s willing to have a discussion with Trans activists only if they agree to be at his beckoned call, have watched his special and admit that Hanna Gadsby isn’t funny.
Oh and if you’re tired of hearing about this, don’t worry it’s only going to get worse!
The allegedly cancelled comedian will be touring his documentary about himself during covid, starting first off in San Francisco on Nov 4th where he claims to be showing up in person. So I expect that will be a huge clusterfuck that will only drum up right wing support for his owning of the libs.
His name is slowly becoming right wing shorthand for hating trans people and I’ve ran into multiple trolls now who attack transgendered people by shouting his name at them.
Can’t believe that today a gynaecologist told me that a hysterectomy wouldn’t be considered as an option for my debilitating period pain on the off chance that I divorce my wife, my sexual orientation changes, I meet a man and decide I want children ������
Update! Dave Chappelle has been so cancelled that… no one cared. There was no fan fair, no protest, no fights for the camera. He came, had a premier and left.
JK Rowling has controversial views, but anti-trans she isn't. Not remotely. That macro is bullshit, Kam.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthinks
It's what you might call misobservational comedy. And as such, it sucks.
She's abstractly pro-trans, as long as it might not affect herself.
She explicitly doesn't want trans women in spaces for women. I think it's pretty fair to say that she's anti-trans. It's a softer prejudice than wanting to kill or convert them, but it's an opinion that's still based on fear of trans people.
She's abstractly pro-trans, as long as it might not affect herself.
She explicitly doesn't want trans women in spaces for women. I think it's pretty fair to say that she's anti-trans. It's a softer prejudice than wanting to kill or convert them, but it's an opinion that's still based on fear of trans people.
I believe her views have been misrepresented. I believe Kam's joke and your apologia here are examples of that. I accept I could be wrong.
Can you provide a citation for "She explicitly doesn't want trans women in spaces for women"?
Re: Return to Gender 101
Linear Mode
