Re: IPCC Fails Again
The IPCC doesn't "do science", it reports on it.
It's also got a very open review process; practically anyone can sign up as an expert reviewer and comment on the drafts. Which makes me wonder why a bunch of stories about errors in the working group 2 report are turning up a year and a half after it was released, when the people finding them could have reviewed the draft stage and improved the accuracy of the report. Surely it couldn't be that there are people who would rather discredit the IPCC than improve it?
Last edited by fragment; 02-06-2010 at 03:20 AM.
|
Threaded Mode
