A Revolution in Thought: Part Two

[Spacemonkey]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

No, that's not the angle I want to discuss right now. I said that from day one that the mechanism as to how the brain is able to use the eyes, as a window, is unknown at this point, but that does not make this model incorrect. I want to show that efferent vision is plausible because the photons are interacting with the film/retina.

Of course you're still overlooking the even more fundamental problem that even if there weren't a solid barrier between the brain and the eyes, the brain still couldn't see because brains don't have eyes.

What you are trying to explain doesn't just lack a mechanism. It is a conceptual confusion, as brains don't look. Only people do. Lacking a mechanism for this is as much of an issue as lacking a mechanism to get further north than the north pole.