Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2006, 05:51 AM
Wholly Goats's Avatar
Wholly Goats Wholly Goats is offline
Tap dancin' with father and son...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: CXXVI
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Scarlatti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Can you then tell me why it can't, or shouldn't, be used as in the instance proposed in the case of Justice Souter's New Hampshire home?
Because that is textbook frivolousness, barely reasonable and purely designed for harassment.
Excuse me, but it was indeed frivolous, but eminently reasonable. Would not Justice Souter's home provide a greater public benefit as a hotel than as his private home? The same arguments apply here as to condemning private property in New London for the building of a shopping center. It was designed to make a point, and I think it made it quite well.

And when was the last time a public road was turned over to a private for-profit organization to raise revenue? Can you cite me a real example?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-29-2006, 03:25 PM
D. Scarlatti's Avatar
D. Scarlatti D. Scarlatti is offline
Babby Police
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: XMMMDLVIII
Images: 3
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Excuse me, but it was indeed frivolous, but eminently reasonable.
But if it's reasonable, then it isn't frivolous.

Quote:
Would not Justice Souter's home provide a greater public benefit as a hotel than as his private home?
I don't think so. It will be a far greater public benefit in a few decades when it's opened to the public as a memorial to Justice Souter's legacy. Future use is part of the eminent domain/public use calculus as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2006, 01:40 AM
Wholly Goats's Avatar
Wholly Goats Wholly Goats is offline
Tap dancin' with father and son...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: CXXVI
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Scarlatti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Excuse me, but it was indeed frivolous, but eminently reasonable.
But if it's reasonable, then it isn't frivolous.
It was frivolous because I'm fairly sure that anyone who read the prospectus regarding the "Lost Liberty Hotel" would have known that it was done in jest. But that does not exclude it from the bounds of common sense...in other words, it was a potentially reasonable request, given the powers which the SCOTUS had assured with the Kelo decision.

And don't tell me one cannot make a valid point with humor, as you engage in it with some frequency.

Quote:
Quote:
Would not Justice Souter's home provide a greater public benefit as a hotel than as his private home?
I don't think so. It will be a far greater public benefit in a few decades when it's opened to the public as a memorial to Justice Souter's legacy. Future use is part of the eminent domain/public use calculus as well.
Whoa! And you think that as many people would pay good money to visit the home of some fusty old SCOTUS justice at some indefinite date in the future? Hell, I live in the PNW and I still have no idea where Justice Douglas' home is or whether they even offer tours. And I'm just an slightly better educated member of the non-legal professional masses. But a chance to rent a room in the "Lost Liberty Hotel"? Wacka! Even if the rubes didn't have a half a brain (like Lyin'Dan), they might still take the opportunity to pay good money to stay in a nice B&B type hotel in New Hampshire. Particularly if they had decent muffins at breakfast.

Your calculus sucks, Scarlatti. The future use as a fusty, musty old memorial to some obscure justice just doesn't rate with a booming B&B hotel. Get with the program, man!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2006, 11:11 PM
D. Scarlatti's Avatar
D. Scarlatti D. Scarlatti is offline
Babby Police
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: XMMMDLVIII
Images: 3
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Your calculus sucks, Scarlatti. The future use as a fusty, musty old memorial to some obscure justice just doesn't rate with a booming B&B hotel. Get with the program, man!
I can't tell whether you're being facetious or not, but the calculus is not mine, it's the Supreme Court's.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2006, 11:18 PM
Wholly Goats's Avatar
Wholly Goats Wholly Goats is offline
Tap dancin' with father and son...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: CXXVI
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Scarlatti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Your calculus sucks, Scarlatti. The future use as a fusty, musty old memorial to some obscure justice just doesn't rate with a booming B&B hotel. Get with the program, man!
I can't tell whether you're being facetious or not, but the calculus is not mine, it's the Supreme Court's.
Then they've got an over-inflated sense of self-importance.

Not surprising, considering.

:roflmao:
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-30-2006, 11:20 PM
D. Scarlatti's Avatar
D. Scarlatti D. Scarlatti is offline
Babby Police
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: XMMMDLVIII
Images: 3
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wholly Goats
Then they've got an over-inflated sense of self-importance.

Not surprising, considering.

:roflmao:
What sort of tests (not examples) would you propose to determine what is and isn't "public use"?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-30-2006, 11:40 PM
Wholly Goats's Avatar
Wholly Goats Wholly Goats is offline
Tap dancin' with father and son...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: CXXVI
Default Re: President Bush Blocks Federal Eminent Domain Abuses

Ones that don't include the possibility of a private developer using a local government to condemn property, which is then turned over the to private developer to turn into a high-revenue stream, income-producing property for the developer/owner.

If the project is as lucrative and beneficial as the developer makes it out to be, there should be no need to utilize the eminent domain powers of a local government. They should just pay the existing property owners the market rate for their land and leave the local government to stiplulate all the necessary code requirements. Period.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 1.09150 seconds with 13 queries