 |
  |

07-04-2006, 11:14 AM
|
|
Israelis speak out against Israel's invasion of Gaza
Quote:
A Black Flag
By Gideon Levy
July 2, 2006
Haaretz newspaper
A black flag hangs over the "rolling" operation in Gaza. The more the operation "rolls," the darker the flag becomes. The "summer rains" we are showering on Gaza are not only pointless, but are first and foremost blatantly illegitimate. It is not legitimate to cut off 750,000 people from electricity. It is not legitimate to call on 20,000 people to run from their homes and turn their towns into ghost towns. It is not legitimate to penetrate Syria's airspace. It is not legitimate to kidnap half a government and a quarter of a parliament.
A state that takes such steps is no longer distinguishable from a terror organization. The harsher the steps, the more monstrous and stupid they become, the more the moral underpinnings for them are removed and the stronger the impression that the Israeli government has lost its nerve. Now one must hope that the weekend lull, whether initiated by Egypt or the prime minister, and in any case to the dismay of Channel 2's Roni Daniel and the IDF, will lead to a radical change.
Everything must be done to win Gilad Shalit's release. What we are doing now in Gaza has nothing to do with freeing him. It is a widescale act of vengeance, the kind that the IDF and Shin Bet have wanted to conduct for some time, mostly motivated by the deep frustration that the army commanders feel about their impotence against the Qassams and the daring Palestinian guerilla raid. There's a huge gap between the army unleashing its frustration and a clever and legitimate operation to free the kidnapped soldier.
To prevent the army from running as amok as it would like, a strong and judicious political echelon is required. But facing off against the frustrated army is Ehud Olmert and Amir Peretz's tyro regime, weak and happless. Until the weekend lull, it appeared that each step proposed by the army and Shin Bet had been immediately approved for backing. That does not bode well, not only for the chances of freeing Shalit, but also for the future management of the government, which is being revealed to be as weak as the Hamas government.
The only wise and restrained voice heard so far was that of the soldier's father, Noam Shalit, of all people. That noble man called at what is clearly his most difficult hour, not for stridency and not for further damage done to the lives of soldiers and innocent Palestinians. Against the background of the IDF's unrestrained actions and the arrogant bragging of the latest macho spokesmen, Maj. Gen. Yoav Gallant of the Southern Command and Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Gilad, Shalit's father's voice stood out like a voice crying in the wilderness.
Sending tens of thousands of miserable inhabitants running from their homes, dozens of kilometers from where his son is supposedly hidden, and cutting off the electricity to hundreds of thousands of others, is certainly not what he meant in his understated emotional pleas. It's a shame nobody is listening to him, of all people.
The legitimate basis for the IDF's operation was stripped away the moment it began. It's no accident that nobody mentions the day before the attack on the Kerem Shalom fort, when the IDF kidnapped two civilians, a doctor and his brother, from their home in Gaza. The difference between us and them? We kidnapped civilians and they captured a soldier, we are a state and they are a terror organization. How ridiculously pathetic Amos Gilad sounds when he says that the capture of Shalit was "illegitimate and illegal," unlike when the IDF grabs civilians from their homes. How can a senior official in the defense ministry claim that "the head of the snake" is in Damascus, when the IDF uses the exact same methods?
True, when the IDF and Shin Bet grab civilians from their homes - and they do so often - it is not to murder them later. But sometimes they are killed on the doorsteps of their homes, although it is not necessary, and sometimes they are grabbed to serve as "bargaining chips," like in Lebanon and now, with the Palestinian legislators. What an uproar there would be if the Palestinians had grabbed half the members of the Israeli government. How would we label them?
Collective punishment is illegitimate and it does not have a smidgeon of intelligence. Where will the inhabitants of Beit Hanun run? With typical hardheartedness the military reporters say they were not "expelled" but that it was "recommended" they leave, for the benefit, of course, of those running for their lives. And what will this inhumane step lead to? Support for the Israeli government? Their enlistment as informants and collaborators for the Shin Bet? Can the miserable farmers of Beit Hanun and Beit Lahia do anything about the Qassam rocket-launching cells? Will bombing an already destroyed airport do anything to free the soldier or was it just to decorate the headlines?
Did anyone think about what would have happened if Syrian planes had managed to down one of the Israeli planes that brazenly buzzed their president's palace? Would we have declared war on Syria? Another "legitimate war"? Will the blackout of Gaza bring down the Hamas government or cause the population to rally around it? And even if the Hamas government falls, as Washington wants, what will happen on the day after? These are questions for which nobody has any real answers. As usual here: Quiet, we're shooting. But this time we are not only shooting. We are bombing and shelling, darkening and destroying, imposing a siege and kidnapping like the worst of terrorists and nobody breaks the silence to ask, what the hell for, and according to what right?
|
I thought that the above was an excellent little editorial, as it hits the nail right on the head.
Although I have a very low opinion of Israeli admin., I am just further dismayed and disgusted by their downright hypocrisy.
The kidnapping of one Israeli soldier is an excuse to invade and shell Gaza strip?
How many Palestinian soldiers, religious leaders, and civilians have Israeli commandos abducted in the middle of the night, and then detained without charge or trial?
The Israeli aggression in Gaza is just downright sickening. How can people just stand by and not say anything?
|

07-04-2006, 08:15 PM
|
|
Re: Israelis speak out against Israel's invasion of Gaza
Quote:
The legitimate basis for the IDF's operation was stripped away the moment it began. It's no accident that nobody mentions the day before the attack on the Kerem Shalom fort, when the IDF kidnapped two civilians, a doctor and his brother, from their home in Gaza.
|
The Al Jazira press has a credibility problem. Why were these people taken? Were they terrorists too? Is there any independent confirmation that this even happened?
BTW - Israel is divided. Israel's press and academia are largely liberal and pro-appeasement. They believe they can actually trade land for peace with an adversary who wants all their land... and them dead.
So have you any independent confirmation? What does Israel say about the abductions?
Thanks.
__________________
FREE LEGAL REPRESENTATION to victims of anti-faith bias including employees, students, teachers, churches, and cities: Alliance Defense Fund, Christian Law Association, American Center for Law and Justice, The Thomas More, The Becket Fund, The Rutherford Institute, Pacific Justice, Christian Legal Society, Liberty Counsel, Home School Legal and Defense Association.
|

07-05-2006, 01:26 AM
|
|
Re: Israelis speak out against Israel's invasion of Gaza
Lionsden, I'm a little confused here. The article is from Haaretz, a major Israeli newspaper. Why do you refer to them as 'the Al Jazira press'? Or am I just confused?
|

07-05-2006, 05:56 AM
|
 |
Dark Lord, on the Dark Throne
|
|
|
|
Re: Israelis speak out against Israel's invasion of Gaza
Quote:
Originally Posted by LionsDen
The Al Jazira press has a credibility problem.
|
1. It isn't AJ.
2. Credibility problems don't seem to slow *you* down, do they?
Quote:
Why were these people taken? Were they terrorists too? Is there any independent confirmation that this even happened?
|
My what a lot of new terms we're learning. "Independent confirmation"? Did you ever apply that to your trollposts about alleged acts of the ACLU?
Quote:
BTW - Israel is divided. Israel's press and academia are largely liberal and pro-appeasement.
|
Incorrect.
Quote:
They believe they can actually trade land for peace with an adversary who wants all their land... and them dead.
|
Silly nonsense.
Quote:
So have you any independent confirmation? What does Israel say about the abductions?
Thanks.
|
Hint:
"Independent confirmation" is not the same thing as "what Israel says about the abductions."
__________________
In the land of Mordor, where the shadows lie...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM.
|
|
 |
|