Court to decide issue of Child Molesters being excluded from childrens' park.

beyelzu · #1 07-07-2006, 04:03 AM

Quote:

There's the man who received counseling and was awarded joint custody of his son, now 7 years old. The pair frequently visits parks and other recreational centers. Because the man is employed at a place within 1,000 feet of a park, he would breach the ordinance by going to work, the suit says.
Another man votes at a public school within range of a sports field. Because he is not eligible to cast an absentee ballot, the new restrictions would keep him from voting, the suit says.

but why should child molesters vote or be allowed to work /sarcasm

LionsDen · #2 07-07-2006, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beyelzu

Quote:

There's the man who received counseling and was awarded joint custody of his son, now 7 years old. The pair frequently visits parks and other recreational centers. Because the man is employed at a place within 1,000 feet of a park, he would breach the ordinance by going to work, the suit says.
Another man votes at a public school within range of a sports field. Because he is not eligible to cast an absentee ballot, the new restrictions would keep him from voting, the suit says.

but why should child molesters vote or be allowed to work /sarcasm

Child molesters are not allowed to vote in FL and some other states. That applies to all convicted felons. Good idea. That keeps bad people from influencing politics. This makes for good morals and social values in our laws.

And as for work, homosexuals and child predators should not work with impressionable children. Laws against this practice are reasonable. I expect a future congress to remove this from federal court jurisdiction and allow states to better protect our children.

...so that's why convicted child molesters shouldn't vote or be allowed to work with our children /sincerity :innocent:

beyelzu · #3 07-07-2006, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LionsDen

Quote:

Originally Posted by beyelzu

Quote:

There's the man who received counseling and was awarded joint custody of his son, now 7 years old. The pair frequently visits parks and other recreational centers. Because the man is employed at a place within 1,000 feet of a park, he would breach the ordinance by going to work, the suit says.
Another man votes at a public school within range of a sports field. Because he is not eligible to cast an absentee ballot, the new restrictions would keep him from voting, the suit says.

but why should child molesters vote or be allowed to work /sarcasm

Child molesters are not allowed to vote in FL and some other states. That applies to all convicted felons. Good idea. That keeps bad people from influencing politics. This makes for good morals and social values in our laws.

And as for work, homosexuals and child predators should not work with impressionable children. Laws against this practice are reasonable. I expect a future congress to remove this from federal court jurisdiction and allow states to better protect our children.

...so that's why convicted child molesters shouldn't vote or be allowed to work with our children /sincerity :innocent:

if they have been released and served their debt to society then their rights should be reinstated which does happen in plenty of states. florida is a bad example cuz jeb actually takes away rights of people who have been convicted of felonies in other states and had their rights restored.