Question for cops or attorney types

[Godless Dave]

Originally Posted by lisarea

Unfortunately, it's a subjective thing, and depends on whether the photos are 'lewd' and 'lascivious,' which also means that even pictures of CLOTHED children can be classified as child pornography because, as I recall, there was some kind of ruling about the 'lascivious display of genitals' or something that concluded that you could display genitals lasciviously even if they were covered.

I actually buy this, because of the pictures I've seen of underage kids dressed in sexy clothes photographed in sexually provocative poses for the enjoyment of pedophiles. There was a thread on this on II, last year I believe. I'm glad to know there are potential grounds to prosecute the assholes who take and market those pictures.