Is beastiality 'unnatural'? - Page 3

Beth · 08-05-2006, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viscousmemories

OMG that's totally me!!!1

Wow! I am sooo psychic!!! Like, fer sure! :yup:

erimir · 08-05-2006, 08:18 AM

Bestiality (as in interspecies sexual behavior) is natural. We see it occur both in non-human animals and in humans. So I guess it must be natural.

So why do you think it matters whether it's natural? Please, explain why you are interested in the question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by beyelzu

angry fag spout,

are you going to marry me or not

I'm a fag, and I'm deeply insulted by your insinuation that angrybellsprout is one of us.

beyelzu · 08-05-2006, 02:59 PM

i apologize to you erimir,

can you ever forgive me?

erimir · 08-05-2006, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beyelzu

i apologize to you erimir,

can you ever forgive me?

Only if you marry me.

beyelzu · 08-06-2006, 12:19 AM

well, im open to proposals and all,

but you might have to fight bellsprout over me

am i worth it?

:tmgrin:

mountain_hare · 08-06-2006, 04:27 AM

But homosexuality is an abomination! How can you perverts even consider violating the sanctity of marriage?

Just sickening.

angrybellsprout · 08-06-2006, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viscousmemories

Quote:

Originally Posted by angry...

Liberals who spout intellectual dishonesty?

Imagine that...

You responded, I guess you must be the troll advocating for the genocide of Catholics.

Yes we know that the only thing that you are capeable of is spouting lies, but hey if you didn't lie all the time, then you wouldn't be liberal.

angrybellsprout · 08-06-2006, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mountain_hare

But homosexuality is an abomination! How can you perverts even consider violating the sanctity of marriage?

Just sickening.

But homosexuality is found in nature, thus it is natural and as such fits well within the defination of marriage.

Perry · 08-06-2006, 06:01 AM

This thread has sure gone downhill. That's too bad because the OP was interesting only for a discussion based on curiosity. This is completely different than discussing ethics. It appears that angrybellsprout just wants to "get the liberals fired up," but does not realize that there are some very intelligent people on this board who think, not just memorize and react.

angrybellsprout, you may find that being social and making friends is more rewarding than trolling... Does trolling really make you happy? I'm sure you would be welcome on this board if you just talk about what you honestly believe, ask honest questions that you're really interested in, and listen to what others have to say.

erimir · 08-06-2006, 06:03 AM

Well, I'm guessing he's not intelligent enough to do so.

Obviously he's not intelligent enough to troll effectively, so actual conversation is probably beyond him.

angrybellsprout · 08-06-2006, 06:06 AM

More lies out of the liberals, who would have guessed?

koan · 08-06-2006, 06:18 AM

I was reading a fictional book a few days ago and it suddenly embarked on a wild scene about a very sensual man obsessed with mating his horses. The scene was set in a thunderstorm and the man coaxes his prize stallion, guiding its malehood to pleasure, in the midst of the storm. It was admittedly sensual while outrageous at the same time.

Not that I can imagine doing such a thing myself.

I recall some friends telling me about the film set they were working on (never saw the film myself) "Freddy Got Fingered" where an elephant is masturbated on camera. They got away with it because, apparently, this is done in animal husbandry.

viscousmemories · 08-06-2006, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angrybellsprout

Yes we know that the only thing that you are capeable of is spouting lies, but hey if you didn't lie all the time, then you wouldn't be liberal.

It's so cute whenever a new troll starts insulting me with what 'we' think. :laugh:

So by 'we', do you mean all the other barely literate, unimaginative Catholic hating bigots here? Because last time I checked you were in a league of your own there. :laugh:

JackDog · 08-06-2006, 07:55 AM

To get back to the original topic, I don't think that bestiality is unnatural and I do think that some animals can give their consent and enjoy sex with people. This is an anonymous internet forum, so I'd might as well tell about my positive experience to give the other side a voice in this discussion.

A few years ago I had a roomate that was on the road a lot during the week, so I was responsible for his dog while he was away. He had a female Wimarariner(sp?), and being a short-haired dog she had an almost naked belly. I'd learned in the past with female dogs (and some cats) that they tend to like it when you rub their vaganal area when you rub their bellies, so I would do that with her. She loved this, so I rubbed her more and one day she had what looked like an orgasm. She bucked her hips uncontrollably for a few seconds then came back to her senses and she began licking my face. This went on for a few months and even though she started to get wet from the stimulation, I never thought anything more of it until she came into my room one night while I was masturbating. She came over to see what I was doing, and instead of pushing her away, I figured that I'd see how far she'd go. I started rubbing between her legs and when she began to get wet, I tried to slip my finger inside her. She seemed to like this and actually backed toward me, so I started working my finger in and out, and she loved that. I gradually got my entire finger inside, but she never loosened up enough for another finger to get in there. If I couldn't get a second finger inside there was no way that I'd get my cock inside, so I tried rubbing the head of my cock against her pussylips. She had an orgasm within a few minutes, recovered, and threw her back end between my legs while she looked over her shoulder and gave me a little bark. So I went back to work and a little while later I had a fantastic orgasm, and that was the first of dozens of times that she came into my room for sex. She would come in, I would sit on the corner of my bed, and she would immediately throw her back end between my legs. The fact that she was always the one initiating sexual contact proved to me that she knew what was happening and gave her consent. Does this make me sick? That's a personal opinion, but if you do feel that way, a lot of other things that I've done and still do will make you hate me even more.

kiwimac · 08-06-2006, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angrybellsprout

More lies out of the liberals, who would have guessed?

Would you please point out where I, for one, was lying?

Kiwimac

mountain_hare · 08-06-2006, 10:39 AM

Holy shit, Jackdog, that's one freaky story!

Although I have heard of female cats behaving in such a way, especially when they are in heat. I've never heard of a person reciprocating, though.

Perry · 08-06-2006, 06:36 PM

Interesting. That particular case sounds harmless, but is likely a rare exception to the general nature of beastiality.

Sock Puppet · 12-13-2006, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackDog

Does this make me sick? That's a personal opinion, but if you do feel that way, a lot of other things that I've done and still do will make you hate me even more.

Hate you? You've got to be kidding. That story was solid Intarweb gold. The only question is, how to respond in a manner worthy of the post. Bide a moment, this requires a bit of prep.

...

Now your username makes a lot more sense, at least.
Hey, the bitch was obviously asking for it.
I'll never look at that Volkswagen commercial with the Weimeraners the same way again.
I'll also think twice before believing that so-called "puppy love" is as innocent as everyone claims.
So, does Pro-Wormer 2(TM) make a good lube?
Now I understand your position on age of consent laws. A 12-year-old canine is damned near elderly. If anything, you're being way too conservative.
Don't worry so much about condemnation from fellow Netizens. Such judgment is much like a farmer, while screwing a sheep (i.e., putting his dick to good ewes), looking over at the stablehand sucking off a ram, and saying, "Ew, that's sick."

(I suppose I missed this first time around because it was an angryBS thread. Given the generic, predictable nature of his posts, I had no idea it would generate a response so ... unique.)

Shelli · 12-13-2006, 05:24 PM

LadyShea · 12-13-2006, 05:46 PM

Cats in heat put their ass up in the air and meayowl like that and rub their scent all over everything to attract any tom cat within the vicinity. What you saw was simply how cats in heat act; she was not purposefully attempting interspecies mating.

The dog was simply investigating a strong odor, and they use their tongues in the process as well. I have had dogs get tampons out of the trash can...nothing to do with wanting to mate with me, just a noraml dog reaction to a strong scent.

You are anthropomorphizing animal behavior and incorrectly labeling it and comparing it to human sexual attractions. That's a fallacy, just not sure which one.

D. Scarlatti · 12-13-2006, 05:48 PM

What's more ridiculous, angryBS's definition of bestiality, or the idea of animals giving consent. Pretty close call.

D. Scarlatti · 12-13-2006, 05:56 PM

Also, the need to explain to an alleged university student the difference between human beings and other mammals over a computer connected to the internet. Come to think of it, that's more pathetic than ridiculous.