Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2008, 11:39 PM
godfry n. glad's Avatar
godfry n. glad godfry n. glad is offline
rude, crude, lewd, and unsophisticated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puddle City, Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: XXMMCMXII
Images: 12
Default Re: Kucinich as thorn in my side

I haven't found a candidate who shares my opinion on ending the professional standing army and reversion to an officer and administrative core of a militia consisting of every capable person between 21 and 45. The militia would train regularly and everybody would be on standby. Public service would be required for those 17-20, where entry roles in the nation's defense would be assigned and the individuals trained in their duties, a national defense training camp. Universal draft. High technology and massive weaponry would be de-emphasized in favor of truly defensive tactics of protecting US citizens on US soil. Sorta of a widened Swiss model with added reduction of nuclear weapon stockpiles.

But then, I distrust standing professional armies.
__________________
:wcat: :ecat:
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2008, 01:11 AM
California Tanker's Avatar
California Tanker California Tanker is offline
Compensating for something...
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: VCMXXXVIII
Default Re: Kucinich as thorn in my side

Quote:
Originally Posted by godfry n. glad View Post
ending the professional standing army and reversion to an officer and administrative core of a militia consisting of every capable person between 21 and 45. The militia would train regularly and everybody would be on standby. Public service would be required for those 17-20, where entry roles in the nation's defense would be assigned and the individuals trained in their duties, a national defense training camp. Universal draft. High technology and massive weaponry would be de-emphasized in favor of truly defensive tactics of protecting US citizens on US soil. Sorta of a widened Swiss model with added reduction of nuclear weapon stockpiles
There's something of a compromise solution I've heard, which is to basically re-role all the high intensity combat units into the National Guard, with the professional army being suited primarily for rapid-response or humanitarian roles with just enough heavy units to meet emergencies. The theory is that if you're going to go invade someone, you're going to have ample time to activate the reserves and get the equipment shipped to where it needs to be, and with the Navy and Air Force up to speed, there's little chance of the war getting to you before you can mobilise these reserve units. (Assuming nobody lobs an nuke your direction, of course: Lots of reservists live in cities!)

You can view it as an extension of the Abrams Doctrine taken to extremes.

Universal conscription, however, is going to be highly unpopular with the military.

For what they do, nukes are rather cost-efficient.

NTM
__________________
A man only needs two tools in life. WD-40 and duct tape. If it moves and it shouldn't, use the duct tape. If it doesn't move and it should, use WD-40.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.26060 seconds with 13 queries