Transformers Mafia - Game Thread - Page 72

Deadlokd · #**1776** 03-22-2010, 01:06 PM

What am I missing here? Who else can detect Megatron? Adam? If he's town he can probably only see what Megatron has done, not identify him. bey could identify him.

Deadlokd · #**1777** 03-22-2010, 01:29 PM

nm

beyelzu · #**1778** 03-22-2010, 03:14 PM

But kael didn't see it and then gonzo didnt see what kael did.

or more accurately kael reported no action for slim right?

and gonzo reported no action for kael.

unvote, vote adam

get to squealing starscream

beyelzu · #**1779** 03-22-2010, 03:29 PM

we kill adam, if adam is innocent, gonzo investigates deadlokd, ja protects me, and contra protects/blocks deadlokd.

if adam is guilty, ja protects me, contra protects/blocks gonzo, deadlokd and es would be on their own.

cuz if adam is guilty than I think that gonzo would be in on it, maybe the scum investigator.

I am also open to a contra lynch, I can see es' suspicion of him. but he just seems so fucking earnest and I don't think I have ever seen scum put in the kind of effort that he seems to be doing.

Adam · #**1780** 03-22-2010, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beyelzu

I can detect that someone is megatron, who did adam actually view slim or liv? I no longer remember

Slim.

[quote=beyelzu;821878No, I just think that trading her death one for one doesn't make alot of sense.[/QUOTE]

We can guarantee that she dies instead of someone with a more useful power, or someone who is already cleared (i.e. you).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ensign Steve

re: Contra

On one hand, he's completely hung up on Megaslim having been the Godfather, there's no way anybody could read him do anything, no way MegaGM could possibly have made roles work differently than in the wiki despite the very obvious fact that this is a uniquely-designed game with all sorts of original roles.

On the other hand, he's willing to cast about for the wildest theories he can imagine in order to condemn/clear certain people, and those theories warp and shift and change based on who he's trying to get people to vote for.

I think he's guilty. I think he's trying to justify voting for innocents and trying to get other people to do the same, and that's why he's so all over the place.

This. Contra has been under my radar most of the game b/c I've been writing this off as newbish enthusiasm, but for reals. I have to be scum because he assumes that Megaslim's role worked in a certain way and there's something fishy about the flavor text from my night one action, Dl must be scum b/c Megamod wouldn't put a cult cop in a game, Gonzo is a role I've never heard of and, hence, guilty. He's throwing blame on multiple people for incredibly flimsy reasons.

I'm leaning more strongly toward my earlier theory: Contra blocked Kael on night 1, explaining why his night 1 result was similar to my night 3 result, even though we both tried to view someone.

unvote; vote: Contra

beyelzu · #**1781** 03-22-2010, 04:09 PM

its hard when your two biggest suspects are at each others throats. on the upside he has to protect who we ask him to because he will be lynched tomorrow otherwise.

I thought kael's result was a little more detailed than yours adam.

I thought his reported result was "slim shady made no actions and no actions were done to him"

I can totally see either you and ja as a scum pair, starscreamgorden.

on the other hand, gonzo/contra could be a team as well.

come on , fess up to being starscream, did it feel good betraying megatron like that?

Adam · #**1782** 03-22-2010, 04:10 PM

Yes, I touched myself while I did it.

Adam · #**1783** 03-22-2010, 04:12 PM

Oh, and to respond srsly, Kael also got modwarned for pasting his actual result PM into the thread.

beyelzu · #**1784** 03-22-2010, 04:14 PM

so are you saying that your results resembled the results that kael was warned about?

I wonder cuz I thought you said you got no result or something. not a no and no.

Adam · #**1785** 03-22-2010, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beyelzu

so are you saying that your results resembled the results that kael was warned about?

I wonder cuz I thought you said you got no result or something. not a no and no.

Here's what I originally said my result was:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

Also, I followed Crumb last night, and was told no action. I don't know if that means that he chose no action, or that he got killed before he could complete it, or what.

And here's where I initially said it was similar to Kael's result:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

Quote:

Originally Posted by Contrapposto

It means that I blocked you

Hmmm, that actually makes sense of something that's been bugging. If you blocked me and I was told no action, then if someone blocked Kael night one, that might explain why he was told no action.

beyelzu · #**1786** 03-22-2010, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

Also, I followed Crumb last night, and was told no action. I don't know if that means that he chose no action, or that he got killed before he could complete it, or what.

this is what you said, but what kael said in his illegally quoted material was more specific, I do believe.

beyelzu · #**1787** 03-22-2010, 04:32 PM

but what if he was lying, what if crumb took no action? what if crumb was blocked by the evil scum role blocker and thus actually took no action.

Kael had more info than you have adam.

Contrapposto · #**1788** 03-22-2010, 05:03 PM

If I am wrong then I will block whoever you say. I simply want it to be someone I trust.
I will be open and probably dead by daybreak regardless so if I am right then I want to block who I think is scum and stop a kill. I really believe I am right. I am newly suspicious of Gonzo but my top two suspects before that were Dl and JA. I will most likely block Dl. So if I am dead by daybreak you will have to decide between JA and Gonzo. Go with what seems most unlikely. If JA protects Gonzo and lives then gonzo and JA are innocent.

You bey decide the final strategy. I trust you to do this. Think how we can stop a nightkill?

Adam · #**1789** 03-22-2010, 05:04 PM

Yes, Kael was more specific when he quoted his result PM than I was when I summarized mine.

What if who was lying? Me?

Contrapposto · #**1790** 03-22-2010, 05:04 PM

At school. Break over. Will chaeck back after 3:30

Gonzo · #**1791** 03-22-2010, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

Gonzo is a role I've never heard of and, hence, guilty. He's throwing blame on multiple people for incredibly flimsy reasons.

a) You have never heard of a flavor cop?

b) I can't seem to do anything without getting attacked for it. Everybody is acting like any vote at all is a vote for them. Again, the only way I may as well please any of you is vote for myself. Why waste my time being helpful?

I'm beginning to suspect that Contra and Adam may be working together. They are the only two I have trusted thus far and I'm beginning to believe that they are using manipulation to persuade us toward voting for each other. By acting as if any move we make is evidence of being scum, they detract from any point we try to make. I can not help the town if I am being constantly dismissed. It is in my opinion that it is Contra who is the blocker who has been disrupting town night actions and has veiled his power as useful to the town. :sadcheer:

Adam is a considerable runner-up for the block role I've suspected/ some other disrupt role.

Honestly, I'm beginning to get frustrated with all of you. Especially you fucking scum. :backstabber:

Adam · #**1792** 03-22-2010, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

Gonzo is a role I've never heard of and, hence, guilty. He's throwing blame on multiple people for incredibly flimsy reasons.

a) You have never heard of a flavor cop?

No, I've never heard of Thief (at least, in a game without items) or whatever role it was that Contra decided you must be based on his perusal of the Mafia Scum wiki.

Ensign Steve · #**1793** 03-22-2010, 07:04 PM

I don't think Gonzo was aware you were parodying Contra's analysis and not offering your own opinion.

Ensign Steve · #**1794** 03-22-2010, 07:04 PM

Do I have it right? Is that what you were doing in the part he quoted?

Adam · #**1795** 03-22-2010, 07:10 PM

What ES said. I'm not saying I suspect Gonzo, I'm saying that Contra claimed to suspect Gonzo for a bullshit reason.

Megatron · #**1796** 03-22-2010, 08:35 PM

Vote count - 8 pages since the last one edition:
(my bad!)

1. Deadlokd
2. Adam -3 (Contrapposto, Gonzo, beyelzu)
3. Contrapposto -2 (Ensign Steve, Adam)
4. Joshua Adams
5. Gonzo
6. Ensign Steve
7. beyelzu

Not voting: Deadlokd, Joshua Adams

4 to lynch.

Gonzo · #**1797** 03-22-2010, 08:39 PM

Oh. I understand now. That changes things.

Maybe Megs should set us up with another deadline? What do you guys think about that idea?

Ensign Steve · #**1798** 03-22-2010, 08:41 PM

I'm ready for a lynch, but I don't think we need to invoke the mod at this time.

Let Dl and JA vote and see what happens.

Adam · #**1799** 03-22-2010, 08:52 PM

Yah, this day has only been going on for a couple IRL workdays now. No need to put a cap on it yet,

beyelzu · #**1800** 03-22-2010, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam

Yes, Kael was more specific when he quoted his result PM than I was when I summarized mine.

What if who was lying? Me?

sorry about that. did you get a detailed account like kael claimed. the two fold claim that crumb did nothing and wasn't targetted?