Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2005, 12:24 AM
Sauron's Avatar
Sauron Sauron is offline
Dark Lord, on the Dark Throne
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: VDCCLXXXVIII
Images: 157
Default Key senator now "less likely" to support Bolton

This is interesting...maybe the neo-cons wont' get their way on trashing the UN:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr21.html

Quote:
Sen. Chafee 'Less Likely' to Support Bolton

By Charles Babington and Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, April 21, 2005; 2:34 PM

A key Republican senator signaled yesterday that he is less likely to support the embattled nomination of John R. Bolton to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations after a dramatic meeting Tuesday, but President Bush today urged the Senate "to put aside politics" and confirm Bolton.

In a speech to insurance agents in Washington this morning, Bush briefly diverted from his planned topic of revamping Social Security to complain about the delay in Bolton's confirmation. "John's distinguished career and service to our nation demonstrates that he is the right man at the right time for this important assignment," Bush said.

Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee (R-R.I.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee that is weighing the nomination, "is less likely right now" to vote to confirm Bolton, his spokesman Stephen Hourahan said in an interview yesterday. The senator, he said, "wants to get to the bottom" of new allegations about Bolton's dealings with subordinates and classified information. Until Tuesday, when committee Democrats attacked Bolton's record and won a three-week extension to investigate it, Chafee repeatedly had said he was reluctantly inclined to vote for Bolton.

A negative vote by Chafee could deeply wound the nomination because it would prevent the committee -- which Republicans control 10 to 8 -- from recommending Bolton to the full Senate. With all eight committee Democrats opposed to Bolton, a Chafee defection would lead to a 9 to 9 tie at best. The nomination then could reach the Senate floor only with "no recommendation" from the committee, a dubious status that might make it easier for unenthusiastic Republicans to vote against it.

Two other committee Republicans -- Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and George V. Voinovich of Ohio -- said Tuesday they also want to probe the new allegations before deciding whether to support Bolton. Voinovich's change of heart prompted the committee to spend three more weeks investigating allegations that Bolton mistreated subordinates, threatened a female government contractor and misled the committee about his handling of classified information.

Bolton, the undersecretary of state for arms control, is a sometimes brusque lawyer whose sharp criticisms of the United Nations are popular in many conservative circles. But Democrats and some Republicans have questioned whether his temperament is suitable for the U.N. post.

When reporters in the Capitol asked Chafee yesterday whether Bush should withdraw Bolton's nomination, he said: "It's too early for that. We all need to talk." When asked the same question later by CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Chafee replied: "We have to discuss that among ourselves, Republicans, I think," and he named the committee's GOP members. Blitzer said, "And you might pass a quiet message to the White House after a discussion like that?" Chafee replied: "Yes, I think that would be advisable."
__________________
In the land of Mordor, where the shadows lie...:sauron:
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2005, 02:29 AM
Sauron's Avatar
Sauron Sauron is offline
Dark Lord, on the Dark Throne
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: VDCCLXXXVIII
Images: 157
Default Re: Key senator now "less likely" to support Bolton

Apparently this clown is pretty much the typical career political jerk: :eek:

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005...ay-basher.html

Quote:
Just when you thought John Bolton, Bush's choice for UN ambassador, couldn't get any creepier. Now there are charges that he tried to destroy the reputation of a whistleblower by spreading rumors to her coworkers that she was lesbian, and that he literally stalked this woman in a hotel, beating on her door and chasing her down hallways. Uh, excuse me, but is that behavior even legal, let alone worthy of a UN ambassador?

Here's an excerpt of the letter the woman wrote to the US Senate:

Dear Sir:

I'm writing to urge you to consider blocking in committee the nomination of John Bolton as ambassador to the UN.

In the late summer of 1994, I worked as the subcontracted leader of a US AID project in Kyrgyzstan....

After months of incompetence, poor contract performance, inadequate in-country funding, and a general lack of interest or support in our work from the prime contractor, I was forced to make US AID officials aware of the prime contractor's poor performance....

Within hours of sending a letter to US AID officials outlining my concerns, I met John Bolton, whom the prime contractor hired as legal counsel to represent them to US AID....

Mr. Bolton proceeded to chase me through the halls of a Russian hotel -- throwing things at me, shoving threatening letters under my door and, generally, behaving like a madman. For nearly two weeks, while I awaited fresh direction from my company and from US AID, John Bolton hounded me in such an appalling way that I eventually retreated to my hotel room and stayed there. Mr. Bolton, of course, then routinely visited me there to pound on the door and shout threats.

When US AID asked me to return to Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan in advance of assuming leadership of a project in Kazakstan, I returned to my project to find that John Bolton had proceeded me by two days. Why? To meet with every other AID team leader as well as US foreign-service officials in Bishkek, claiming that I was under investigation for misuse of funds and likely was facing jail time. As US AID can confirm, nothing was further from the truth.

He indicated to key employees of or contractors to State that, based on his discussions with investigatory officials, I was headed for federal prison and, if they refused to cooperate with either him or the prime contractor's replacement team leader, they, too, would find themselves the subjects of federal investigation. As a further aside, he made unconscionable comments about my weight, my wardrobe and, with a couple of team leaders, my sexuality, hinting that I was a lesbian (for the record, I'm not).

When I resurfaced in Kyrgyzstan, I learned that he had done such a convincing job of smearing me that it took me weeks -- with the direct intervention of US AID officials -- to limit the damage.
__________________
In the land of Mordor, where the shadows lie...:sauron:
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.44314 seconds with 12 queries