Quote:
Originally Posted by livius drusus
He didn't actually do the deed himself, Moosie. I suppose the jury felt the evidence of his involvement wasn't sufficient to warrant a muder conviction.
|
Some of the jury. According to one article I read the prosecution put manslaughter on the table (using the rationale that maybe Killen ordered a beating, not a murder) because they were afraid the jury would be hung on murder, as they were in 1964. Although in 1964 there was only one hold-out on the jury, and her stated reason for sticking with not-guilty was that she couldn't convict a preacher.
Anyway yeah, this is clearly just a token effort. This dude is on his last leg and I don't think there's any way he's gonna do any hard time before he kicks it. But most of the relatives of the victims seem satisfied that it's better than nothing.