 |
  |

05-07-2012, 05:28 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
And complaining about people thinking you're mentally ill is an easy way for you to avoid answering questions about your "model"...IOW it's just an excuse for you to weasel.
|
No, it's a normal reaction to a situation that is getting unbearable.
|

05-07-2012, 05:30 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
You still sound like an idiot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
that means there is no gap between locations
|
But there is a gap, a measurable physical distance between two points. It exists. You cannot name a mechanism by which it ceases to exists without violating physical laws.
|
No LadyShea, you're just not understanding this phenomenon. That's exactly why the Sun would be seen instantly if it was turned on at 12:00 (efferent vision), but it would still have to travel the actual distance of 8 minutes to reach Earth at 12:08 where we would have light to see each other.
|
You haven't explained the "phenomena" in a way that makes it possible. You said there is no gap. There is a gap. How do the eyes and cameras close the gap?
If there were no gap, visually, you wouldn't be able to see depth or distance, it would be like seeing a flat screen with everything on the same plane..IOW 2 dimensional.
|
I already answered this. The gap which allows us to recognize depth is interpreted in the visual cortex. This has nothing to do with anything.
|

05-07-2012, 05:35 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
There is nothing in this model that changes the properties of light
|
Except for the non traveling light part, that's a changed property of light
|
There is no non traveling light. There is only non-absorbed light which is revealed when the object absorbs the other part of the spectrum. As the Sun emits its photons in a continuous stream, the parts of the white spectrum split up depending on the consistency of the object it illuminates. This does not mean that the non-absorbed part of the spectrum travels indefinitely through space and time even though photons from the Sun are constantly replacing old photons.
|

05-07-2012, 05:45 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Oh give it over, you cannot bear to be away from us Peacegirl! Us, the only half-dozen people on the planet who even know that your book exists, and that only because we find it an amusing heap of claptrap! You tried to stay away, but every time you keep getting drawn back in for another mental spanking - you seem to really enjoy them. Like all masochists, it is the attention that draws you.
Face it honey: you are not here for the hunting! You enjoy every last minute of it: after all, if it wasn't for us it would just be you, a leaky roof, and a giant pile of books that are somehow completely failing to take the world by storm.
|
Have you already forgotten that I've done no marketing? Of course the world hasn't taken this book by storm. The world doesn't know this discovery exists.
|

05-07-2012, 06:06 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
There is no non traveling light.
This does not mean that the non-absorbed part of the spectrum travels indefinitely
|
All light travels indefinitely. When it has been absorbed and transformed into another type of energy it is no longer light.
If it is light, it will travel indefinitely until it is no longer light because it has been absorbed, that is a property of light that you are trying to change.
|

05-07-2012, 06:10 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Quote:
What I mean by this is if something is meant to be recognized as truth, we don't have the ability to know when this will occur, but we can feel confident that it will occur when it is supposed to occur
|
Good thing this is not a faith!
|
My faith that it will occur when it is supposed to occur is based on a scientific principle.
|
What scientific principle?
|
And you think you understand his discovery with a question like that? 
|
I would like to know what scientific principle relates to "something being meant to be recognized as truth" as well as relates to "when that is supposed to occur"
Those are woo/spiritual/religious idea, not scientific ones, so I'd like to know what scientific principle you are basing that on.
|

05-07-2012, 06:13 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
And complaining about people thinking you're mentally ill is an easy way for you to avoid answering questions about your "model"...IOW it's just an excuse for you to weasel.
|
No, it's a normal reaction to a situation that is getting unbearable.
|
No, a normal reaction is to remove yourself from the unbearable situation, or to solve the problem creating the unbearable situation. In your case you can solve the problem of people thinking you're mentally ill by not acting mentally ill.
|

05-07-2012, 06:15 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
God is in charge, so all of this is in His hands.
|
Odin? Zeus? Yahweh? Vishnu? Ra?
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
What I mean by this is if something is meant to be recognized as truth, we don't have the ability to know when this will occur, but we can feel confident that it will occur when it is supposed to occur. Does this make sense to you?
|
It makes sense if one believes in personal gods that have plans and give a shit about the timing of truth revelations or whatever.
What I mean by this is that you are talking about religious and spiritual ideas, and those aren't scientifically derived...they come from faith.
|
This isn't about formal religion or personal gods. This is about a law of our nature which is propelling us toward a unified world in accordance with God's timing. Everything, including your reaction, is under the control of this law.
|
Impersonal laws of nature have no timing, do not propel anything, and are indifferent to the idea of a "unified world"
|

05-07-2012, 06:27 PM
|
 |
I'm Deplorable.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
The world doesn't know this discovery exists.
|
And just who's fault is that, you are the one with the book, no-one here has been hiding it.
|

05-07-2012, 06:56 PM
|
 |
Astroid the Foine Loine between a Poirate and a Farrrmer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Oh give it over, you cannot bear to be away from us Peacegirl! Us, the only half-dozen people on the planet who even know that your book exists, and that only because we find it an amusing heap of claptrap! You tried to stay away, but every time you keep getting drawn back in for another mental spanking - you seem to really enjoy them. Like all masochists, it is the attention that draws you.
Face it honey: you are not here for the hunting! You enjoy every last minute of it: after all, if it wasn't for us it would just be you, a leaky roof, and a giant pile of books that are somehow completely failing to take the world by storm.
|
Have you already forgotten that I've done no marketing? Of course the world hasn't taken this book by storm. The world doesn't know this discovery exists.
|
As I said - not here for the hunting.
|

05-07-2012, 07:00 PM
|
 |
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Oh give it over, you cannot bear to be away from us Peacegirl! Us, the only half-dozen people on the planet who even know that your book exists, and that only because we find it an amusing heap of claptrap! You tried to stay away, but every time you keep getting drawn back in for another mental spanking - you seem to really enjoy them. Like all masochists, it is the attention that draws you.
Face it honey: you are not here for the hunting! You enjoy every last minute of it: after all, if it wasn't for us it would just be you, a leaky roof, and a giant pile of books that are somehow completely failing to take the world by storm.
|
Have you already forgotten that I've done no marketing? Of course the world hasn't taken this book by storm. The world doesn't know this discovery exists.
|
Golly gosh, peacegirl, whose fault is that? Who has been wasting ten years of her life getting laughed at on various message boards? If you had spent that time doing proper marketing, the whole world could be laughing at this stuff by now.
|

05-07-2012, 07:09 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Lots of big ideas took off with no marketing. Jesus didn't have a PR firm or run advertisements! Neither did Muhammad or Buddha. There are YouTube videos, Twitter feeds, and blogs with millions of viewers/readers that never did one shred of marketing or advertising. How many (almost fanatical) readers does PZ Myers have?
Good ideas that resonate with people get spread because that's what humans do.
|

05-07-2012, 07:32 PM
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Oh give it over, you cannot bear to be away from us Peacegirl! Us, the only half-dozen people on the planet who even know that your book exists, and that only because we find it an amusing heap of claptrap! You tried to stay away, but every time you keep getting drawn back in for another mental spanking - you seem to really enjoy them. Like all masochists, it is the attention that draws you.
Face it honey: you are not here for the hunting! You enjoy every last minute of it: after all, if it wasn't for us it would just be you, a leaky roof, and a giant pile of books that are somehow completely failing to take the world by storm.
|
Have you already forgotten that I've done no marketing? Of course the world hasn't taken this book by storm. The world doesn't know this discovery exists.
|
Ten years of flogging Lessans and his book on forums is marketing. I would hazard that tens of thousands of people have been exposed and still you got nothing. If something hasn't happened by now, it will never happen.
|

05-07-2012, 07:54 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Peacegirl, here's a very simple disproof of efferent vision and real-time photography. Both require a camera to be able to record the color change of a distant object in real-time. So when a distant ball changes from blue to red, a camera must be able to photograph it as red as soon as it has become red. But if the camera is inside the range where the traveling non-absorbed light has yet to return to 'white full-spectrum' light, then all that light will be blue before the color change. And at the very moment the ball changes to red (i.e. has turned into a ball that absorbs all but red photons) there are no red photons at the camera. They were previously all being absorbed by the ball, and are only now free to bounce off the ball and begin traveling towards the camera. So none of them can be at the camera yet. But the camera cannot produce a red image on film without any red photons there to chemically interact with the film. So the camera cannot produce a real-time image of the newly red ball, and real-time photgraphy and efferent vision are thereby disproved. QED.
|
That's the afferent theory Spacemonkey. If the object is in range (which is not required in the afferent model), and if the non-absorbed light reveals the object but does not travel (although the non-absorbed photons are continually being replaced by the Sun's energy), then you are misunderstanding what is actually happening. You are still imagining a great distance between the object and the camera which would then cause a time delay. But if the camera is aimed at the object, then the light becomes an instant mirror image just like it does with the eyes, and there is no time involved.
|

05-07-2012, 07:59 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Lots of big ideas took off with no marketing. Jesus didn't have a PR firm or run advertisements! Neither did Muhammad or Buddha. There are YouTube videos, Twitter feeds, and blogs with millions of viewers/readers that never did one shred of marketing or advertising. How many (almost fanatical) readers does PZ Myers have?
Good ideas that resonate with people get spread because that's what humans do.
|
I know that's what humans do if they get excited about something, but before I start marketing this way, I have to plan it very strategically. I think the best way to go about this is to get some endorsements first. The last thing I need are people skimming it and giving bad reviews just because they don't understand it. This is not easy reading for the average person, as you well know.
|

05-07-2012, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Lots of big ideas took off with no marketing. Jesus didn't have a PR firm or run advertisements! Neither did Muhammad or Buddha. There are YouTube videos, Twitter feeds, and blogs with millions of viewers/readers that never did one shred of marketing or advertising. How many (almost fanatical) readers does PZ Myers have?
Good ideas that resonate with people get spread because that's what humans do.
|
I know that's what humans do if they get excited about something, but before I start marketing this way, I have to plan it very strategically. I think the best way to go about this is to get some endorsements first. The last thing I need are people skimming it and giving bad reviews just because they don't understand it. This is not easy reading for the average person, as you well know.
|
Yes, you plan it very strategically, peacegirl, and be sure you get some endorsements first! I suggest sending a copy to Stephen Hawking!
Oh, too bad Will Durant isn't around anymore! Seymour sure told him!
And, yes, this stuff is WAY over the head of the average person! As we well know!
|

05-07-2012, 08:06 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No LadyShea, you're just not understanding this phenomenon. That's exactly why the Sun would be seen instantly if it was turned on at 12:00 (efferent vision), but it would still have to travel the actual distance of 8 minutes to reach Earth at 12:08 where we would have light to see each other.
|
So you are saying that when the Sun is turned on, there will be a 'mirror image' at the eye but no light yet at the eye, right?
So what does that mirror image consist of?
|
Obviously light is interacting with the retina due to the fact that the object can be seen. If the object can be seen (in real time), then the light's job, so to speak, is not to bring any images anywhere. The light's property is to reveal what's out there in the material world. But if there is no light on Earth because it hasn't arrived yet, then the requirement for seeing you, who is next to me, hasn't been met, therefore, I have to wait 8 minutes.
|

05-07-2012, 08:24 PM
|
 |
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No LadyShea, you're just not understanding this phenomenon. That's exactly why the Sun would be seen instantly if it was turned on at 12:00 (efferent vision), but it would still have to travel the actual distance of 8 minutes to reach Earth at 12:08 where we would have light to see each other.
|
So you are saying that when the Sun is turned on, there will be a 'mirror image' at the eye but no light yet at the eye, right?
So what does that mirror image consist of?
|
Obviously light is interacting with the retina due to the fact that the object can be seen. If the object can be seen (in real time), then the light's job, so to speak, is not to bring any images anywhere. The light's property is to reveal what's out there in the material world. But if there is no light on Earth because it hasn't arrived yet, then the requirement for seeing you, who is next to me, hasn't been met, therefore, I have to wait 8 minutes.
|
What can one do but laugh?
If peacegirl marketed Lessans' book as a parody of a crackpot she might actually realize her goal of making money off of it. I wonder if she realizes this.
|

05-07-2012, 08:27 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No LadyShea, you're just not understanding this phenomenon. That's exactly why the Sun would be seen instantly if it was turned on at 12:00 (efferent vision), but it would still have to travel the actual distance of 8 minutes to reach Earth at 12:08 where we would have light to see each other.
|
So you are saying that when the Sun is turned on, there will be a 'mirror image' at the eye but no light yet at the eye, right?
So what does that mirror image consist of?
|
Obviously light is interacting with the retina due to the fact that the object can be seen. If the object can be seen (in real time), then the light's job, so to speak, is not to bring any images anywhere. The light's property is to reveal what's out there in the material world. But if there is no light on Earth because it hasn't arrived yet, then the requirement for seeing you, who is next to me, hasn't been met, therefore, I have to wait 8 minutes.
|
Um, is the answer to the question "what does that mirror image consist of?" in there somewhere?
|

05-07-2012, 08:30 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Lots of big ideas took off with no marketing. Jesus didn't have a PR firm or run advertisements! Neither did Muhammad or Buddha. There are YouTube videos, Twitter feeds, and blogs with millions of viewers/readers that never did one shred of marketing or advertising. How many (almost fanatical) readers does PZ Myers have?
Good ideas that resonate with people get spread because that's what humans do.
|
I know that's what humans do if they get excited about something, but before I start marketing this way, I have to plan it very strategically. I think the best way to go about this is to get some endorsements first. The last thing I need are people skimming it and giving bad reviews just because they don't understand it. This is not easy reading for the average person, as you well know.
|
Oh, endorsements you say? Who do you think will give you these endorsements? Why are you talking to us instead of them?
|

05-07-2012, 08:32 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
and if the non-absorbed light reveals the object but does not travel (although the non-absorbed photons are continually being replaced by the Sun's energy),
|
Where do the not absorbed yet replaced photons go? Where are they now? If they "rejoin white light" doesn't that mean they are still traveling, but simply are not traveling alone, but in the presence of other photons?
|

05-07-2012, 08:32 PM
|
 |
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Um, is the answer to the question "what does that mirror image consist of?" in there somewhere?
|
|

05-07-2012, 08:38 PM
|
 |
I said it, so I feel it, dick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
davidm, what does Jell-O brand gelatin consist of?
Last edited by LadyShea; 05-07-2012 at 08:48 PM.
|

05-07-2012, 08:50 PM
|
 |
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Obviously light is interacting with the retina due to the fact that the object can be seen. If the object can be seen (in real time), then the light's job, so to speak, is not to bring any images anywhere. The light's property is to reveal what's out there in the material world. But if there is no light on Earth because it hasn't arrived yet, then the requirement for seeing you, who is next to me, hasn't been met, therefore, I have to wait 8 minutes.
|
How is light "interacting with the retina" before the light arrives? Please be specific.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Who do you think will give you these endorsements?
|
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|

05-07-2012, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
I'm not going to allow you to act this way just because you don't like my answers.
|
How do you plan on disallowing any action of mine?
|
I can't disallow any action on your part, but I can ask you treat me with respect. If you choose not to, then the next move is mine.
|
LOL, but you didn't ask me to treat you with respect, you told me you weren't going to allow me to act this way. Which, as you now admit, you can't do.
|
You know what I meant. I can't actually stop you from doing what you want to do. That's one of the principles which leads to the discovery. Principle #1: Nothing in this world has the power to make you do what you don't want to do (barring force), for over this you have mathematical control. I can ask you nicely, I can tell you that if you continue I won't talk to you anymore, etc., but I can't make you stop if that's what you want to do. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 20 (0 members and 20 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 PM.
|
|
 |
|